"Johnny!!! You hit Bobby in the face, pushed him to the ground, jumped repeatedly on his back, gave him The Peoples' Elbow, and then stole his toy tractor... was that a good choice or a bad choice?"
"Um... *looking at teacher as if she has two heads* ...um... a bad choice?"
"Right, a bad choice. You need to make good choices. Ok?"
"Right. Good choices. Can I go play with this tractor now?"
The preceding conversation, or words to that effect, I've heard far too often at school. I've talked about it before, but it seems to get worse. Permit me a little philosophical play here.
Every time a child does something bad they are told to consider the choice they made with their bad action. The child is then grilled until they can admit it was a bad choice. Afterwards they are reminded that they need to make good choices, not bad choices. The child is not bad. Just his choices. Do good choices. Avoid evil choices.
We make choices based on the good, or an apparent good. We always choose what we think is a good. Think about that. Even if you decided to do something purely based on it being bad, and you wanted that action to be bad... you would still see some apparent good in doing so. Thus, one always acts towards an apparent good. A child hits, pushes, jumps on a kid, and steals his toy tractor because he thinks it is good for him to have the tractor, cost what may.
What is missing from the situation (besides God, of course, but this is a public institution where there can be no mention of God, or religion... except when it comes to the darling yoga)... sorry, what is missing from the situation is
being. Why make good choices? Well, when choices are separated from being, there is a logical disconnect. Hence the child staring blankly at the teacher, completely unaffected by a few words about good choices. The child's look is really saying:
"Are you suggesting my actions are ontologically separated from me?"
There is an old scholastic axiom:
Operari sequitur esse - Action follows being. Our choices come from an intellect/will tandem. Our intellect processes, debates and rationalizes, even for a split second, and presents the case to our will. The will chooses an apparent good. Note that our intellect and our will are the highest powers of our soul. We are rational beings. This is actually quite amazing. Our choices, then, bear the dignity, and responsibility, of being partakers of the image of God.

Going back to bad bad Johnny (all bad kids in examples are named Johnny, so don't name your child Johnny). What Johnny did was not some act separated from who he is. Not some mere choice, but rather a choice in fact made from the highest powers of his soul, being, and ultimately body. Johnny made a bad choice, yes. Johnny in fact sinned. He offended God, self, and neighbour. However, clearly we cannot hear the following at a public school:
"Johnny! You did all of this to Bobby! This is sinful! Depending on your morose delectation, and the gravity of hurt inflicted, quite possibly a grave sin! I will call Father Con Fessio immediately!"
While that won't happen, we still must refrain from separating choice from being; a modern day Cartesian "ghost in the machine." Rather, a child who treats others wrong, and yes makes bad choices, must know that he, his whole person, is responsible...
"Johnny! You did all of this to Bobby!" You KNOW that was wrong! You deliberately hurt Bobby badly in order to steal from him. You will be punished for this, and afterwards you will be making an appropriate apology to Bobby. If you can't control yourself, you won't be playing with others, simple as that."
*Johnny ashamedly looks up at the teacher as the gravity of what he did starts to sink in. But it all makes sense to him.*
Yes. Makes sense to him. Common sense.
If you choose it.