A Mass is a Mass is a Mass? Although the Mass is the one true sacrifice of Christ, ultimately how it is celebrated is of great importance to us. We use our senses to soak in what is around us. If what we see, smell, and taste is like bacon, well, that's probably what it is. If it looks, smells, and feels like a pig with lipstick, that's probably what it is. A Mass is a Mass is a Mass is somewhat like saying a car is a car is a car. Sure a k-car and a ferrari are both intended to get you to your destination, but there is a significant difference in how quickly and effectively each one will.
With this in mind, I must confess that I prefer attending the Extraordinary Form of the Mass (EF) over the Novus Ordo Mass (NO.. and I don't mean "NO" as if to put it down... far from it! It's simply just the initials for Novus Ordo). Becca and I wish we lived closer to Saskatoon, thus making it easier for us to attend on a regular basis.Here are my main reasons why for prefering the EF:
1 - Latin
2 - Music
3 - Not the "Look at Me!" show
4 - No (or very few) liturgical abuses
5 - Communion Rail
6 - Altar boys
7 - Ad Orientem and more beautiful in general, such as with vestments, high altars, etc.
8 - The prayers
9 - The priestly actions are more controlled.
10 - More continuity with the Church's organically developed practice.
"But wait!" you say. "Many of these things are sometimes in the Novus Ordo Mass!" Correction. These things are/should-always-be in the Novus Ordo Mass. Let's take a look at my list again.
1 - Latin
Sacrosanctum Concilium (Vatican II document) permitted the vernacular. However, the language of the Church, and the Mass, is still Latin. This is why I refuse to simply call the EF rite the Latin Mass. The EF rite and the Novus Ordo rite are both intended to be in Latin. In fact, the recent Novus Ordo General Instruction of the Roman Missal tells us that, at the very very least, we should all be singing the parts of the Mass in Latin.
"Since the faithful from different countries come together ever more frequently, it is desirable that they know how to sing together at least some parts of the Ordinary of the Mass in Latin, especially the Profession of Faith and the Lord’s Prayer, according to the simpler settings.[cf. SC 54, Inter Oecumenici 59, Musicam Sacram 47]"(GIRM 41).
Latin is profound. Even if you don't understand it, a certain Ratzinger used to say that even this is a symbol of the fact that a heavenly language is needed to proclaim the praise and mystery of the Mass. Isn't it ironic that liberals in the Church freak out over people not standing together at communion, "for the sake of unity," yet scoff at a universal language of prayer.
2 - Music
The vast vast majority of Novus Ordo Masses have music that makes you want to stab your ears with pencils until they are rendered incapable of ever hearing another Dan Schutte-me-now narcissistic folk sing song again. On the other hand, at the EF Mass we attend great care is taken to providing beautifully chanted Mass parts (note: not added on songs) that actually sing praise to God, not man. But the Church has always taught that Gregorian chant is the measuring stick for sacred music. Again, GIRM 41 says:
"The main place should be given, all things being equal, to Gregorian chant, as being proper to the Roman Liturgy. Other kinds of sacred music, in particular polyphony, are in no way excluded, provided that they correspond to the spirit of the liturgical action and that they foster the participation of all the faithful.[cf. SC 116, also SC 30]."
Sacred music is the greatest of artistic treasures in the Church. It is not just for the EF but for all liturgies.
3 - Not the "Look at Me!" show
4 - No (or very few) liturgical abuses
Let's group 3 and 4 together. Wouldn't it be odd for a priest at the EF Mass to start changing the words of the Mass, and start rambling off in Latin about praying for Aunt Betsy's pet llama and how good it is to see so many youth at Mass and that we must truly care for mother earth because this is the greatest cause of Christianity this day. Heck, it would be weird to hear a Latin "good morning!" immediately following the opening sign of the cross. It's just... out of place. Once again, though, this holds true for both the NO and EF.
5 - Communion Rail
I love the communion rail. So practical. So reverent. Even the "scrum" leading up to communion is great. There are no ushers. This means that those who do not think they are prepared to receive communion are not pressured to receiving. I mean, really? Everyone goes to communion in the NO liturgy. Everyone is in a state of grace? Once again, though, communion rails can be for both the EF and NO.
6 - Altar boys
Again, even in the NO priests have the right to have only a male sanctuary. Altar boys go beyond the immediate Mass. There is the idea that they are also experiencing a closeness to Mass which helps in the discernment process.
7 - Ad Orientem and more beautiful in general, such as with vestments, high altars, etc.
This is a significant point. I firmly believe, for strong theological reasons, all Masses should be said
ad orientem. The Mass is primarily a sacrifice, with the priest offering the needs of the people, and himself, on the altar (Ratzinger,
Feast of Faith). Also, it is a sign of the missionary Church seeking the promised land (Exodus). Going along with ad orientem worship is beautiful high altars, and a greater care for beautiful vestments and such. But you get the point here. Such things should also be seen in Novus Ordo Masses. In fact,
ad orientem, as I understand it, is still the primary way to say Mass in the NO. Thankfully Cardinal Robert Sarah, head of the Congregation for Divine Worship, is working on this.
(Note: I'm currently reading the new book about him... wow! What a saint!)
8 - The prayers
I remember in university when I started going to the EF Mass in Saskatoon. I was blown away with how profound the prayers were, to the point of reading through the little red manual while eating breakfast each morning. Unfortunately many of the NO prayers were hastily made up, or very poorly translated. Furthermore, what's with all the option for the Eucharistic Prayers? Originally the sixties liturgists argued that they were trying to act in the name of an alleged Hippolytus text. This reasoning has since been disproved. All in all, I hold that the prayers in the EF Mass are more profound and beautiful. Note: am
not saying that the NO prayers are not profound and beautiful!
9 - The priestly actions are more controlled
The actions of the priest in the EF Mass fill me with awe. Signs of the crosses here, genuflections there. A deep bow here. This word spoken aloud, then back to a whispered voice. The priest is a slave to what is going on. I hear stories about priests who, once they learn to say the EF, are impacted deeply, and feel they, for the first time, understand how to say the Mass.
Once again, though it may be difficult, the mentality of the priest as a slave to the liturgy is certainly possible in the NO.
10 - More continuity with the Church's organically developed practice
Look, I've read Vatican II many times. Certain documents of it I've read easily over fifty times. I have literally written hundreds of pages on Vatican II, including summaries for each and every document. Whenever someone tries to interpret Vatican II to me, I always wait to see if they mention another document:
Mediator Dei by Pius XII. The long and short of it is, Vatican II can not, shall not, will not be read faithfully unless it is read in light of
Mediator Dei. Withouth
Mediator Dei, Vatican II becomes what we now experience it to be. With
Mediator Dei and its teaching on Church continuity, Vatican II becomes what it is supposed to be. In other words, All these reasons why I prefer the EF mass over the NO mass can all be solved if Vatican II is read in light of
Mediator Dei. Let me put it this way. The most beautiful, prayerful, and wonderful mass I ever intended was... a Novus Ordo Mass. It was a Latin Novus Ordo mass at St. Patrick's in Montreal. Everything that I have mentioned above was done properly, in light of the Church's organic development, as taught in
Mediator Dei. It was a Mass I will never forget. I long for such a Mass.
So a Mass is a Mass is a Mass? When following the full teaching of the Church, it's possible. But then, all things are possible when we follow the full teaching of the Church. What an extraordinary thought.