So much talk. Honestly, I'm very confused right now. If you find this blog posting confusing, it's because it deals with confusing matters.
I speak of the Papacy of Francis, Bishop of Rome. Now what I say is all opinion. Further, it is opinion that could easily change by next week. If you want the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, read the Gospels, or the Catechism.
Holy Thursday
For me it all started on Holy Thursday. Yes, that awful terrible day when Pope Francis went to a prison and, perhaps somehow granting himself an exemption from the existing rubric, washed the feet of women during the liturgy. Having been so immersed in the teaching of Pope Benedict XVI (of venerable memory), to wash the feet of women in the liturgy signaled, to me, a lack of understanding for the essence of the liturgy. Benedict, the master theologian, clearly explains that worship, and the liturgy, come only from God. Going back to Mt. Sinai, ceremonial precepts were Divinely instituted (and strictly enforced). Without worship mankind was lost, and so God, in His goodness, was reaching out to His people, sort of along the lines of the Mass prayer: "our desire to praise You is itself Your gift." Benedict goes so far as to explain that a major part of the problem with the Golden Calf was not simply idolatry, but that the Israelites tried to create their own worship. You get the point here: worship comes from God, and is faithfully handed down (with both continuity and organic development) via the Church. To wash the feet of women at the Holy Thursday liturgy wasn't just a minor detail then, it went against the very basis of all of Benedict's teaching.
"So what? Who cares? Isn't the Holy Thursday liturgy also about service?"
Competing signs do not sit very well either, especially for a Thomistic brain. Yes, the washing of the feet signifies service. It also very much so signifies the institution of the priesthood. The two signs go perfectly together. This is what our liturgy (coming from God through the Church) does, it all just ends up fitting together, as only God can orchestrate. Pitting two signs against each other is rather ridiculous. For instance, in the 1970s theologians tried to change the Mass from a sacrifice to a meal. Huh? Benedict, in
Feast of Faith, says that the Mass is both (though it is primarily a sacrifice). Competing signs? How utterly 1970ish. Yes, I believe Pope Francis was wrong to do what he did. He made life a whole lot more difficult for those who have been fighting to follow the Mass rubrics in light of the ex-hippy feminists who demand otherwise. But St. Peter wasn't perfect either. And, if nothing else, we see that Pope Francis has a heart of gold.
World Youth Day
Then there was World Youth Day. I still just shake my head at it. Communion in plastic cups. Offering beach balls at Mass. Girls swimming in immodest bathing suits during Mass. Elder bishops embarrassing themselves with some flash mob dance, all led by a gay porn poster boy. To be clear, this would have happened regardless of who the Pope was. These events are often hijacked by people with specific agendas. I'm against big outdoor Masses in general (more for theological reasons... how can a priest concelebrate while sitting 300m away?.., but also for liturgical abuse reasons). However, the Pope cannot take control of every detail with these events. He must trust his bishops. His bishops must trust their staff members and priests. In the end, these events inevitably go awry somewhere along the chain.
But the end of World Youth Day signified the beginning of another phenomenon:
the interview.
Now here's the deal: the Church has a hard time reaching people. If your diocese is like the one I'm in, you frequently get letters from the Bishop that are to be read before/during/after Mass. The letters usually begin with little substance, end with even less substance, and produce a few Zzzzs here and there. Sorry to sound so mean, but the reality is they don't work. Probably because they never say anything of importance (e.g. "Dear Sisters and Brothers... as seasons change, and waters flow, let us remember that God made water... and we should be mindful to be stewards of water..." or something like that). In other words, the basic letter from bishops is not working. Pope Francis, I believe, understands this. I believe he knows that, by and large, the hierarchy of the Church, in this present form (letters etc.) is not being listened to with great interest. And so, like a good shepherd, he is seeking to change this. Enter the interview.
Following World Youth Day the Pope gave a doozy of an interview while flying home. I can just picture it. The Pope absolutely excited (pumped, stoked, etc.) about the large enthusiastic crowd he just ministered to. And so, he opens up. And he does so with gusto. He sets off bombshell comments about such things as "who am I to judge?" and other hot topic issues. Truth be told, the Pope simply explained the Catechism, but in a slightly different way.
"Tell Me More, Tell Me More"
Ever since then it seems we're always getting interviews. And with the interviews has come the confusion, and dare I say loose lips. Now some of this has been completely and utterly blown out of proportion by the media. This cartoon summarizes it best:
And they've not just been taking what Pope Francis says out of context. The translations, apparently, have been horrendous. This last interview had a section where the Pope was explaining that he had the humility to get the job done (curia reform). Suuurrrrre he bragged about his humility.
They did it with Benedict, and they're doing it with Francis. Now after every interview there seems to be countless Catholic bloggers, and I'm talking bloggers with PhD's, who come out and meticulously try and explain what Pope Francis is really saying. And, to be honest, sometimes they are just guessing.
Quite frankly, much of what we've been reading from these interviews has not always made sense. There's the calling out of those obsessed with ending abortion (where are all these minions of people?). There's been the declaration that youth unemployment and elderly loneliness are the greatest evils of our times (I still wonder if that is what he actually said. I sure hope not). There's been sloppy talk about the "Old Mass" as if it is a nostalgic Mass not on par with the "New Mass" (in addition to the Franciscan restrictions regarding Summorum Pontificum). There's been confusion over conscience and even proselytization (where does this exist again?). There's been comments made against those who prayed rosaries for the Pope, and then stated the number of rosaries in total that were prayed (as a spiritual bouquet). There's even been a comment that the Church has never been stronger (come to Saskatchewan!). I could go on and on. Each one of these remarks could have a long blog post dedicated to them. What was actually said? Whom was it said to? What was the context? How does this comment fit in with the teaching of the Church? What is the Pope really getting at with this or that comment? It would take an awful long time to examine each point.
But, to be honest, much of it makes little sense. And it hurts me to have to say that. Many people are very confused as to not only what he is saying, but why. One should not need a PhD in order to decipher what a Pope is saying to his flock. I don't have a PhD. And I'm confused.
The Effects
Inevitably the actual effects of these interviews must be discussed. Now, from my very narrow perspective of one little Catholic in Saskatchewan in the midst of the Universal Church ministering to the entire world filled with every culture, creed, race, religion, and human soul... this very narrow perspective of mine sees problems with what is going on. And herein lies the punch line to the title for the blog post: "The Spirit of..."
We all know about the disastrous phrase "the Spirit of Vatican II." It has scorched our poor Church. It has been the punch line for a licence to disobey Church doctrine and discipline. I was thinking that maybe the libs were finally running out of steam. Maybe, just maybe, progress was being made, and the whole "Spirit of Vatican II" agenda was fading. Again, I would attribute the phenomenal teaching of Pope Benedict as not only giving light to the situation, but also to providing ammo for faithful Catholics to fight back (ammo as in very clear statements which defend Church teaching, and are easily understandable). Well, it has been suggested this past week that the Church's next big fight will not be in combating "the Spirit of Vatican II."
Instead, it will be in combating
"the Spirit of Francis."
"Are YOU Attacking the Pope?"
Of course not. Vatican II is great when understood in light of all Church teachings, especially Pope Pius XII's
Mediator Dei. I just hate the so called "Spirit of Vatican II." Pope Francis seems like a great man, but I fear a true "Spirit of Francis" is building. That is, regardless of Church teaching, heck, regardless of Vatican II, one can take these Pope Francis interviews and spin them whatever the heck way you want to. Why not? I can't really understand what he's getting at much of the time, and even feel uneasy about some of it. I think (again, just opinion) what will happen if this continues is that the libs will increasingly hurl snippets of Pope Francis interviews here and there, and press on with renewed enthusiasm. Many Catholics on the internet are already saying it has begun, with the big catch phrase thrown at them lately being "who am I to judge?" Long story short, the interviews by Pope Francis are beginning to hurt the Church over here. Actually, let me be more precise: the interviews, both as a medium and as snippets of random unprepared Pope Francis thought, are beginning to hurt the faithful, orthodox, front-line Catholics in North America.
The True Mission
Now that I've proceeded to school Pope Francis on what he's doing wrong (how many years in purgatory for that?), I will tell you what he needs to do right. Oh, and for the record, take what I say with a grain of salt. Obviously Pope Francis has the Holy Spirit helping him constantly, and I truly do not know better than him. Just play along with me here. Anyway, to quote God, here's what he needs to do: "rebuild My Church."
Pope Francis needs to continue boldly reforming the hierarchy of the Church which, by all accounts, is filled with corruption. There are many saints in the Church, but there are many corrupt people as well. And this is exactly what Pope Francis is doing. He's re-writing procedures, booting people out, bringing people in, even excommunicating people. This is the mission that Benedict, despite his sheer awesomeness, knew he would be unable to undertake. I think Pope Francis understands this very well. I think he understands the harm of having priests who speak out against the faith. I think he understands the scandal that the LCWR (Hippy Nuns for the Ruin of the Church) can bring. I think he understands how utterly difficult it is for us lay people to never, never, have set confession times. I think he understands the devastation caused by bishops who ignore their flocks and make underhanded dealings (e.g. hiding problems with D&P), or lay people who would rather criticize and gossip than seek out Christ (
mea maxima culpa). He understands the rebuilding that is needed, or better yet, the need to expose the wound so that Christ can heal it. This, I believe, is what he was elected for primarily. And this, I believe, is what he will do. The Church cannot evangelize Christ unless it first lives Christ. Despite all of Pope Francis' words - far too many words - it will be his actions that ultimately will guide this poor Church forward. Yes, at times I get incredibly frustrated with him. Whoops. I just said that out loud. Ok, I may as well admit it: I get incredibly frustrated with Pope Francis at times. But despite this frustration, I know that he has a most difficult mission, and that he is very courageously taking action. The weight of what he is doing, the weight of the cross he bears for doing it, would surely crush me within a Hail Mary or two. Besides, and I believe this is the proper context for me to reiterate his words, "who am I to judge?" So ultimately I just have to say this to Pope Francis: Thank you! You are doing an amazing, wonderful and necessary task. And as for all that other stuff I talked about, I'll keep praying for you. But please pray for me too, dear Holy Father. May we carry on...
...in the spirit of charity.

The Comments Box is closed.